Critical Review:
Rosmawati, (2013). Analysis the Use of the Kind of Deixis on ‘Ayat-Ayat Cinta’ Novel by Habiburrahman El-Shirazy, International Journal of Humanities and
Social Science , Volume 13, Number 17,
September 2013.
Reviewed
by Yoga Pradana
The topic that discussed in this article is about deixis
found in ‘Ayat-Ayat Cinta’ Novel . She concerned deixis persona,
space, time, discourse,
and social contained in the Ayat- Ayat Cinta novel (p. 59). Rosmawati
said ‘this research can contribute the
importance of understanding
and preserving literature
through language, especially
for the next generation so
that the value
of emotions which
contained in the
language will be
resolved (p.57).’ This is
supported by (Jayasudarma, 1994 : 59),
(Sumarno, 1987: 10), Lyons (1995: 270), Suyono (1990:12). Rosmawati claims that
The complexity of deictic
problems in this
discourse that encourages
her to conducted a study
on the use
deixis in literary discourse (p. 59).
Her study aimed to describe the kind of deixis on
‘Ayat-Ayat Cinta’ Novel. Theoretically, this study is expected to be useful for
researchers of language and literature because the novel has its own
peculiarities (p.57). A word is said to be deixis
if its reference or referral/reference moving or changing
depending on who
the speaker and
it depends on
the time and
place of the
word spoken, Suyono (1990:12). According Noerhadi (1982: 27), which
need to be
understood from the
above chart is
differentiation-concrete physical
objects, then lingual region or language
where every word can be broken down into
elements of visual-auditory (letters and sounds). By use these theories
Rosmawati concerned deixis persona,
space, time, discourse,
and social contained in the Ayat- Ayat Cinta novel (p. 59).
In his method, Rosmawati Writes that she collected the
data through intensive reading,
Then, the data was
collected described by using
descriptive synchronic method,
Synchronic descriptive methods
include (1) the
collection of data
usage deixis in Ayat- Ayat Cinta novel, (2) sorting, classification,and
analysis of data on the use of deixis of pronomina persona, space, time,
discourse, and social (p.59). She used descriptive method
with a number
of procedures, namely
(a) gather data
usage of deixis,
(b) identify and classify the data usage of deixis on deixis persona,
space, time, and place, discourse, and social, (c) to analysis data of usage
the deixis, and (d) making the conclusion usage of deixis data.
By using the theories and method above Rosmawati found, Based on
data analysis, Ayat- Ayat Cinta novel
by Habiburrahman El - Shirazy
includes a number
of deixis, namely persona
deixis, place deixis, time
deixis, discourse deixis,
and social deixis.
Each deixis is
presented below.
1 . Persona Deixis
Persona deixis is one form pronomina deixis.
In the novel of Ayat- Ayat Cinta found the usage of persona deixis, both the
first and second persona deixis or third
persona. The first persona deixis using the form I, my, our, and us, second
persona deixis using
a form you, kau,
and the form
of greeting, like
you, or by
calling names, for example, Mary, and a third persona
deixis using the form he , he, ia, and
they, are as plurals. More clearly, the following three types persona deixis is
described.
1.1 First Single Persona Deixis
a. Persona Deixis Aku ( in English I )
The data below is the first persona deixis
(1) I (Aku) feel young
cleric Sheikh Ahmed is a unique (p. 17)
(2) I (Aku) was the only
foreigner, as well as the only one from Indonesia (p. 16 and 17)
(3) I've (Aku) been too busy
with work and family (p. 22)
(4) "I (Aku) memorized
a letter and letters of Mary Almaidah by rote" (p. .24)
I (Aku)
was at the data (1) refers to Fahri. This was evident in a conversation
between Sheikh Ahmed Fahri with
on p. 17, namely: "Akh
Fahri, where are you going? " Said Shaikh
friendly with a smile on his face is clean ... Meanwhile, in
data (3) experiencing
a transition deixis
I'm referring to
Ashraf (p.59).
Based on
the data analysis Rosmawati said that there are two forms deixis first persona
in the novel of Ayat- Ayat Cinta, namely (1) persona I (aku) and (2) persona I
(saya) . Each of these first persona has a different referral using. Persona I
(aku) in the novel of "Ayat- Ayat Cinta" based analysis used in informal
situations, for example in speech acts
between two participants
who know each
other or are
already familiar, while
persona I (saya) is used in
formal situations, as seen in the data (6) ie "I think this is a good idea
2 . Deixis place (tempat)
In the
second type of deixis Rosmawati found Deixis
place is giving
shape location, space
(place) is seen
from the location
of the person/role
in the event
of language (Nababan 1987:
41). In the
novel of Ayat-Ayat Cinta found deixis which
refers to the place,
as shown below:
(33) If not here (di sini),
in Shubra El Khaima there .. (p.27).
(34) Akh Ashraf, you want to
get down here (di sini) right? I asked .... (p. 35)
The form of
here (di sini) in the data (33) refers to a city, where as the form of
here (di sini) in the data (34) refers to a specific place (carriages). To be
clear, the following is a quote that supports the data (33) and (34).
"Many
stationery stores, where
copy and computer
supply stores in Hadayek .
If not here
(di sini), usually
in Shubra El Khaima." (p.27). The quote reinforces that here (di
sini) refers to a city. In contrast, the
form here (di sini) that refers to a specific place that specifically looks at
the quote: "I entered the carriage
number five. I'm pretty sure there will be a place to sit. In a hot climate
like this certainly deserted passengers." When examined further, the form
of here (di sini) in the data (33)
refers to a more spacious the form of here (di sini) in the data (34) which refers to a very specific
place. This happens because different contexts. Rosmawati Writes, an
understanding of the two forms of the same requires the involvement of the
context the word is used (p.63).
3 . Deixis Time
Deixis
time (temporal or
time) does often
lead to misinterpretation of the reader
or listener .
This is due
to themeaning of
these words can
be too narrow
and broad. Furthermore,
Nababan (1987: 41)
argues that the deixistime is disclosure (giving
shape) at a
point of time
or distance is
seen from the expression time
something ismade, for example,
today (sekarang), yesterday (kemarin), tomorrow (besok), and the day after
tomorrow (lusa).The use of
deixis time in
Indonesian is different
with deixis time
in English. Without
having to explicitly
showtime information, when
in English can
be seen from
the changes in
the verb form.
The following Englishsentences difference would seem obvious:
I am reading a book now .
I had read a book .
Rosmawati
writes that indecision is the present
(sekarang) and the past(kemarin). What is now on in the same sentencewith this
second, this hour, and today? Likewise, past the next sentence, if earlier,
yesterday, and last year ? To reinforce
the time information,
in English, can be
added the words
like: now, yesterday, and
last year. In thenovel of
Ayat- Ayat Cinta found deixis time, as shown below
(34) Now (sekarang) we sip Friendly goldfish ?
(p. 59) .
(35)
Later that night (besok) should be back racking brain (p. 65) .
(36)
This evening (besok) we also
thanksgiving (p. 70) .
(37)
Exactly midnight (kemarin) we went to suthuh (p. 71) .
4.
Deixis Discourse
Rowmawati
said Deixis discourse related
to the words
or phrases that
serve to reveal
any part of
the sentence in
thediscourse/speech (p.64). Nababan (1987: 42) calls deixis discourse by
reference to certain parts of the discourse that has been given and/or are being developed. The forms
are often used to express deixis discourse, of which, is deixis
which includes
pronouns, both persona
and demonstrative, deixis
place, and much
more. Furthermore, Nababan(1987:
42) gives an
example of the words: the
former, the first,
the following, and the like
refer to the
sectionslisted above with
Anphora terms and
words which have
reference to the
text content thereafter
referred to as kataphora .Deixis discourse
serves to facilitate
the interpretation or
understanding of the
discourse, both written
and oral discourse discourse. In
short Rosmawati writes , more of a deixis discourse conjunctions and words
deiksis demonstrative (p.64). In any discourse almost certainly contain the
word deixis, like persona he (ia), she (dia), or it (nya); deixis place,as here
(di sini), there (di sana), there (di situ), and connecting words between
sentences in a discourse.
5 . Deixis Social
Rosmawati claims Novel of Ayat-Ayat Cinta
provide specific views with the use of deixis social ( p.65). Social context,
specifically marked social differences in between speakers and opponents said.
The use of deixis social can be seen in the data below:
(50) "Mas Fahri, the air is too hot. The
weather is too bad. What you should not just rest at home ?" (P. 18) .
(51)
Mr Boutrus and Mary a little surprised at my suggestion (p. 82) .
(52)
The mothers confused and report on Mbah Ehsan (p. 115) .
(53)
He was a disciple of Sheikh Mahmoud Khushari, who earned the nickname of
legendary scholars Syaikhul
Maqari’
Wal Huffadh Fi Mashr or professor of readers (pembaca) and learn by heart
(penghafal) Al - Quran in Egypt (p. 162)
Study of deixis social support that a person
known for his role relevant to the problem or by a general known role. A person
has more than one role is relevant in a given period. In general it can be said
that in a particular social context, only the part played by a person at a
particular time.
However, I think this
research is quiet good because the theory and the finding is real and can be
proven. In the conclusion rosmawati said that All of
deixis found in
the novel of
Ayat-Ayat Cinta are an
expression or statement reflect
the social system, economic system, education system,
the idea system, and system of values describing what is desired and what is
rejected (p.65).
References:
Hobbs, P. (2003). The Medium is the
Message: Politeness Strategies in Men’s and Women’s Voice Mail Messages. Journal of Pragmatics, Vol 35, pp: 243-262.
Jayasudarma, T. Fatimah, 1994. Wacana dalam Hubungan
Antarunsur. Bandung: Eresco.
Lyons, John, 1995. Pengantar Teori Linguistik.
Jakarta: Gramedia.
Nababan,
PWJ, 1987. Ilmu Pragmatik
(Teori dan Penerapannya). Jakarta:
Proyek P2LPTK,Dirjen Dikti.Depdiknas.
Noerhadi,
Tuty Heraty, 1982.
“Bahasa sebagai Penggambaran
Dunia” dalam Bambang
Kaswanti Purwo (Ed)
PELBA 5. Jakarta: Lembaga Bahasa Unika Atma Jaya.
Parera. D. J., 2004. Teori Semantik. Jakarta:
Erlangga
Purwo. Bambang Kaswanti, 1984. Deiksis dalam Bahasa
Indonesia.Jakarta: PN Balai Pustaka
Sumarmo,
Narmo, 1987. “Pragmatik
dan Perkembangan Mutakhirnya”
dalam Pertemuan Linguisttik
Lembaga
Bahasa Atma Jaya. Jakarta: Unika Atma Jaya.
Supriyadi,
2006. Pembelajaran Sastra yang
Apresiatif dan Integratif
di Sekolah Dasar.
Jakarta: Departemen
Pendidikan Nasional.
Suyono, 1990. Pragmatik, Dasar-Dasar dan
Pengajarannya. Malang :YA3.
Tarigan, H. G., 2011. Prinsip-prinsip Dasar Sastra.
Bandung: Angkasa
Winaraku, Wordpress.com April 2009. Yule, George, 2006. Prakmatik. Yogyakarta:
Pustaka Pelajar
No comments:
Post a Comment